At its core, accessibility is about designing and building digital experiences that people, including those with disabilities, can use effectively. Making a digital product accessible is a process, not something that happens overnight. The first part of that process is an accessibility audit to gauge where your website currently is.
A well-structured accessibility audit delivers a clear, high-level view of the digital property’s status for stakeholders, while providing detailed, well-organized reports that guide your accessibility journey beyond a simple list of issues. It allows your team to prioritize remediation based on your goals, focusing on the most important improvements while creating a sustainable roadmap for the future.
If you're evaluating how to approach an accessibility audit or comparing vendors, our upcoming webinar explains what organizations should expect from a WCAG accessibility audit, what questions to ask, and how to evaluate different approaches.
Register for the webinar: What to Look for in a WCAG Accessibility Audit →
Read more about how I tell my clients how they should conduct their web accessibility audits
An accessibility audit is a strategic view of your digital experience, identifying barriers for users, and highlighting areas of potential legal exposure. A solid audit:
See how UsableNet's audits make finding and fixing web accessibility easy
The first thing we tell our clients to do is figure out their audit goals. This will shape the scope, time, and resources you will need to allocate for accessibility. Considerations include:
Test your website’s accessibility now and get real-time feedback in minutes →
Start your audit with a combination of automated testing and targeted manual testing to identify early wins:
This initial approach helps teams gain traction and begin showing tangible improvements fast.
We cover this in detail in our upcoming session on how to evaluate accessibility audits and testing approaches. Join the webinar to learn what to expect from a WCAG accessibility audit →
Your initial audit should focus on a very small scope. This early phase is about setting the right mindset, helping the team understand what accessibility remediation involves, and clarifying how it may affect timelines, so everyone is prepared for what comes next. It also gives you the opportunity to apply lessons learned from this first review to similar pages, templates, and components across the site before progressing to the full audit. Once those issues are addressed, you are ready to move into the second phase.
At this stage, you can repeat the audit, this time expanding it to cover the full Web Content Accessibility Guidelines across what we call a representative sample, a carefully selected set of pages, templates, and user flows that collectively reflect the different layouts, components, interactions, and content types used across your website.
Testing every single page isn't reasonable or feasible. However, by choosing a meaningful and well-structured representative sample, you can still achieve high coverage, ensure consistency, identify anything missed in the initial phase, and verify that accessibility remains strong as you scale beyond the most critical paths.
Once this phase is complete, you can continue with additional pages or refine the representative sample to include different sections of the site. This iterative approach helps your accessibility program scale effectively across your entire digital experience.
Since you are now focusing on a broader scope, you need to provide the necessary context to guide remediation. This includes outlining a set of parameters to define an action plan, along with consistent documentation of the issues, which is essential for the subsequent phases:
Critical user journeys: Prioritize issues that have the greatest impact on users’ ability to achieve key goals or access important content.
Job Role Filters: Group issues by role so developers, designers, and content teams can quickly focus on what’s most relevant to their work.
Impact parameters: Document key details for each issue, such as severity, complexity, responsibility, technology, applicable success criteria, whether duplicated, user need, and affected HTML elements.
Practical guidance: Include team-specific guidance where relevant:
This approach ensures issues are prioritized based on user impact, grouped meaningfully for the team, and documented with actionable, role-specific guidance.
Consistent and robust documentation helps maintain momentum and demonstrate due diligence:
Accessibility is a continuous process:
An audit alone is not enough to implement accessibility across your organization. Accessibility requires constant testing, fixing, and validation of fixes to ensure everyone can use your website. Although it might seem like a lot, accessibility doesn’t have to be overwhelming.
Partnering with UsableNet ensures expert guidance through the entire accessibility journey: auditing, prioritization, remediation, and ongoing monitoring. Our support helps you:
Partner with UsableNet today to start your accessibility journey.