AI answers are increasingly present across search experiences, but there is no secret tag that guarantees visibility. What works for people also works for machines: content that is clear, structured, and text‑first. That is precisely what the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) require.
In this post, I keep the focus on accessibility. Core WCAG practices—headings and landmarks, descriptive links, alt text, captions, transcripts, labeled forms, and clean HTML—enhance the usability of your pages with assistive technology and facilitate parsing and citation by AI systems. The goal is not a gimmick.
The goal is to provide better experiences, fewer barriers, and content that can be understood and reused in various contexts, including AI assistants and modern search.
Accessibility and machine understanding overlap more than most teams realize.
Where they align
<th scope> preserves header–cell meaning for summaries and conversions.Where they differ
People handle state; models mostly read text. Screen reader users rely on the accessibility tree and keyboard interaction to open menus, activate controls, complete forms, and follow live updates. LLMs typically ingest the HTML and text and may not execute complex client‑side interactions.
ARIA is essential for users; models weigh visible text. Roles, names, and states drive usable interactions; models lean on visible hierarchy and copy.
Bottom line: Designing for WCAG enhances experiences for people and increases the likelihood that AI systems accurately interpret your content. LLMs don’t replace accessibility—they benefit from it.
Ensure key copy is server‑rendered, statically rendered, or hydrated predictably so it’s indexable and visible to both audiences.
Verify sitemaps and canonicals are accurate and policy pages remain public per your governance.
Some will use AI tools to locate or summarize information when a site is difficult to navigate. That does not reduce the need for accessibility. If headings, labels, or transcripts are missing, models have less reliable text to quote—and users still face barriers at conversion points.
My stance: Accessibility is the root fix. WCAG improves screen reader experiences and reduces ambiguity for AI systems, increasing eligibility for modern discovery while protecting compliance and conversions.
Teams that add transcripts, fix headings, and clarify link text report smoother screen reader flows, richer snippets in search, and fewer support escalations. The same changes make content easier to quote in internal knowledge tools and AI assistants.
[Blog] AI and Accessibility: Why Web Accessibility Should Be Part of Your AI Agent Strategy
[Webinar] Mastering WCAG 2.2 AA for Devs and Designers — Requirements, who they serve, and benefits.
[Webinar] Demystifying Accessible Design: How to Apply WCAG 2.2 — Practical application for product teams.
[Blog] WCAG 2.2 Is Here—What It Means for Your Business — What the latest standard means for sites and apps.
[Guide] Manage Accessibility Testing at Scale — How to find and prioritize issues efficiently.
AI answers are everywhere, but there’s no hidden tag to guarantee visibility. What works for people also works for machines: content that is clear, structured, and text‑first. That’s exactly what WCAG requires. Core WCAG practices make pages easier to use with assistive technology and easier for AI systems to parse and cite.
Goal: Better experiences, fewer barriers, and content that can be understood and reused across contexts—screen readers, search, and AI assistants.
Want to see these fixes on your site? Book a quick demo.